Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
417
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 17:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
I'd really like to know what kind of person does stuff like that for s**t and giggles.
A portrait of some sort, an archetype which I can refer to.
The idea of meeting someone like that IRL is worrying. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
417
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
[quote=Erotica 1
This is one of the most disgusting posts in this thread and borders on the real world crime of swatting. Looks like you wish for me and my family to suffer real world fear over some internet spaceship alleged pixel scam thing. Get some help.[/quote]
Yeah, that was stupid.
You, however, have no business talking about disgusting.
You've gone too far to have any authority on that subject.
This isn't about the scam. It's about the way you treated that man.
I'm not one of those who think that CCP should ban you. I'm not against scamming, either. And yes, I've seen far worse than this.
But players like you are a large part of what drives people away from EVE, and I'd rather have ten more newbies around, rather than a "content creator" like you.
Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
419
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Navi Annages wrote:David Kir wrote:[quote=Erotica 1
This is one of the most disgusting posts in this thread and borders on the real world crime of swatting. Looks like you wish for me and my family to suffer real world fear over some internet spaceship alleged pixel scam thing. Get some help. Yeah, that was stupid. You, however, have no business talking about disgusting. You've gone too far to have any authority on that subject. This isn't about the scam. It's about the way you treated that man. I'm not one of those who think that CCP should ban you. I'm not against scamming, either. And yes, I've seen far worse than this. But players like you are a large part of what drives people away from EVE, and I'd rather have ten more newbies around, rather than a "content creator" like you.
How he treated a racist piece of scum? He'll end up in an orange jumpsuit keep pushing it. Sohkar will goto jail.[/quote]
I don't think so.
But don't care about that. I care about the fact that people like E1 actively drive away new players.
Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
420
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
Navi Annages wrote:Riptar Teg for CSM!!!!!
A message sponsored by Riptar Teg at the expense of a nice poor man by the name of Sohkar who couldn't be with us today because he's in an orange jumpsuit sitting in a prison cell wondering if his cellmate is going to be kind or rough this evening.
Cold hard reality of life is Death threats = Prison time.
Heres the math forumla
Death threats = REAL LIFE PRISON TIME FOR SOHKAR
RIPTAR TEG FOR CSM!!!
Ripard isn't going for CSM this year, he made it public quite a bit of time ago. Please refrain from sperging all over the forums. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
420
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:David Kir wrote:
I don't think so.
But don't care about that. I care about the fact that people like E1 actively drive away new players.
Got any evidence for that? Personally I joined EVE because of its freedom to scam, loot and pillage.
I joined EVE because of the danger, too.
But that's irrelevant.
We aren't talking about "scamming, looting and pillaging". We aren't talking about "da rulez", either.
We're talking about unethical behaviour, and the reputation deriving from it.
Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
420
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Brusanan wrote:David Kir wrote:baltec1 wrote:David Kir wrote:
I don't think so.
But don't care about that. I care about the fact that people like E1 actively drive away new players.
Got any evidence for that? Personally I joined EVE because of its freedom to scam, loot and pillage. I joined EVE because of the danger, too. But that's irrelevant. We aren't talking about "scamming, looting and pillaging". We aren't talking about "da rulez", either. We're talking about unethical behaviour, and the reputation deriving from it. Eve is a game that is notorious for unethical behavior. It thrives on it. Your ethics have no place in my Eve.
There are various degrees of unethical behaviour.
Driving over a frog isn't the same as driving over a man. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
420
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:
except unethical behavior is what brought us here.
lies, deceit, theft, betrayal. the myriad of morally bankrupt shenanigans are what made this game so appealing to many people.
There are various degrees of unethical behaviour. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
420
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
Navi Annages wrote:
There called tools. Ethics has nothing to do with it.
What?
I'm not a native english speaker, I can't speak from a position of authority, but that makes very little sense. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
421
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:David Kir wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
except unethical behavior is what brought us here.
lies, deceit, theft, betrayal. the myriad of morally bankrupt shenanigans are what made this game so appealing to many people.
There are various degrees of unethical behaviour. no. something is either ethical, or it isn't.
I beg to differ.
Accidentally killing a dog isn't ethically regarded in the same way in which accidentally killing a man is. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
421
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Giovanni erkelens2 wrote:David Kir wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
except unethical behavior is what brought us here.
lies, deceit, theft, betrayal. the myriad of morally bankrupt shenanigans are what made this game so appealing to many people.
There are various degrees of unethical behaviour. unethical is a relative understanding. just like good and bad. unethical is a understanding misused by both sides to prove their own superiority and correctness.
Would you bother to explain your point? Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
421
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:44:00 -
[11] - Quote
Brusanan wrote:David Kir wrote:There are various degrees of unethical behaviour.
Driving over a frog isn't the same as driving over a man. Your ethics are completely arbitrary, and so are mine. That is why society collectively comes up with rules and laws, instead of requiring each individual to use their own ethics as a guide. No rules or laws were broken here, and your ethics are irrelevant. Move along.
This kind of behaviour is considered immoral, however. And that's relevant.
People don't want to play a game that exposes them to this kind of behaviour. They won't even try it.
And that's what bothers me. That a few players like E1 can give EVE such a bad reputation.
This isn't GHSC infiltrating a corporation and pulling off a massive heist. This doesn't make for good advertisement material. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
422
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 19:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Brusanan wrote: People don't want to play a game that exposes them to immoral behavior? So you speak for all of us now?
People don't what to play a game that exposes them to this kind of immoral behaviour.
Which also applies to the EVE playerbase.
There's a reason why most of it is in hisec: they want to be protected from what other gamesdefine as "griefing".
You can lie to yourself as much as you want, but most of EVE's playerbase is not comprised by people who are here for the "loot, pillage and scams".
Most players are "carebears", people who are yet to dip into the various forms of PVP that this game can offer.
And they're as important as the PVP-addicted.
That's the kind of people this stuff scares off.
And I'd like them around, so I can shoot them. Ingame.
Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
427
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 19:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
How is it immoral? Honestly. Did you think Fear Factor was immoral? Because that game show kind of did the same thing Erotica does during the last few stages of the bonus round (asking one to voluntarily humiliate themselves and/or place themselves directly in the path of something they fear). Again... the contestant can walk away at any time. And there HAVE been winners. Just because it's REALLY hard to win, doesn't mean it's impossible.
When you play EVE, you get exposed to lots of different sociopaths, and that has been accepted as par for the course. Even players who are well-adjusted, high-functioning members of society, away from the keyboard, turn into cackling supervillains out to ruin everyone's day, the moment Aura says "connecting". And that fact has done nothing but give EVE publicity and subscriptions, since day 1.
Lastly..... are you seriously suggesting that every player should be expected to act like an ambassador for the game, and provide free advertisement to CCP? You MUST be a carebear, because only carebears willingly treat this game like a job.
No, I don't think that we should all act like ambassadors.
I do, however, think that this kind of extreme behaviour has great influence on EVE's reputation.
The best and the worst, that's what sticks.
And as I've already said, this does not make for good advertisement.
BR, Asakai, the GHSC heist, Burn Jita, goons piling 2k people in a systme, that's good publicity.
Some random guy humiliating another player is not.
Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
428
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 20:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:A line was clearly crossed guys.
Erotica 1 gained possession of someone's in-game assets and then ask that they sing in order to get them back.
This is unprecedented in EVE Online's history and clearly violates the EULA
Article Section 3 Paragraph 2 Subparagraph 6 The user shall not, at any point, request that another user sings.
Clearly.
But wait this was on TS3 so does the EULA cover it, or not?
If the EULA covers it... what part of the EULA did Erotica 1 breach?
If the EULA does not cover it... then why are we even having this discussion? No laws were broken, either.
Because we aren't discussing EULA matters. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
428
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 20:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:
I don't think so.
But don't care about that. I care about the fact that people like E1 actively drive away new players.
It is well known that I regularly dole out free isk and advice to new players. [/quote]
It is not.
Your reputation is that of scammer (ISK doubler, otherwise said), not of a community benefactor. And that's not an issue.
What is an issue is being cruel to other players, provoking them and humiliating them for your personal enjoyment, recording all of it and making it public.
I do know that EVE's gameplay implies a certain degree of cruelty, but this is far beyond what one would call gameplay mechanics.
I am not one of those who want you banned, I'm one of those who are disgusted. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
430
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 21:01:00 -
[16] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:The only purpose is to humiliate the victim for as long as possible. The assets are already taken so there's no other point to it. Completely false. It's about ISK only.
It may be, but it involves provoking and humiliating another player, recording all of it and making it public. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
435
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 21:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
No, you're the one defending a vicious and hateful racist who made death threats over video game assets, not us. There is never any excuse to do what he did, least of all some 'jerk' playing with them over teamspeak. Your stance here shows the same kind of immorality and irresponsibility as the so called 'victim'.
There's quite the difference between the actions and words of an angry man, and the purposeful provocation and humiliation inflicted by E1.
Anger brings out the worst of us. You can expect an angry (or a drunk) man to act as a stupid and vile person.
What's disgusting is E1's lucidity, while doing all of this.
Don't try to blame the victim. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
435
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 21:18:00 -
[18] - Quote
Myriad Blaze wrote:Interesting thread... On one side there is a gullible (and at least situationally naive) person who willingly gave away all his in-game stuff and accepted the terms of the bonus room. Which probably wasn't a good example of human intelligence.  On the other side we have a clever person who took advantage of the not so clever guy. Which probably wasn't the epitome of kindness.  And then things were said, stuff happened and then more things were said. And now we have a threadnought asking tons of question... Was it illegal? Is Ero a criminal now? - Ugh... serious? I don't think so... No. Was it against the EULA? Did it break the rules? - Erm... that's hard to say. It seems that it's not exactly covered in the rules. Did it happen in the game? - Well... it's somehow an edgy case. Technically it was not in the game, but it started there. Maybe we're just not asking the right questions... Can CCP do something against it? - Yes, of course. Could it harm the game? - If **** hits the fan? Yes, very much probably. The answer to the last question is the main reason why I think CCP should do something about it. That brings us to another, maybe the most important question: What should CCP do? Ero didn't really make a secret out of his bonus room. Nor is the bonus room really new. Remember the thread in GD about the guy who was podded back to newbie SP status? CCP can not claim that they didn't know. And since they didn't do anything about it then, doing something drastic now would be unfair. Because with no warnings given Ero was in his rights to believe not being in the red with CCP. It would have been easy for CCP to approach Ero and tell him discreetly to shut down the bonus room "or else". It's still possible to do that and simply lock this thread for the excessive trolling going on on both sides. Btw, I did say last November, that I wouldn't suggest to draw that much attention to the bonus room. I guess I'm not always wrong. 
Being podded to newbie SP condition is an accepted gameplay mechanic. All of us accept it whenever we undock.
Being provoked and humiliated, recorded and made fun of in public is not. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
435
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 21:23:00 -
[19] - Quote
Navi Annages wrote:David Kir wrote:
There's quite the difference between the actions and words of an angry man, and the purposeful provocation and humiliation inflicted by E1.
Anger brings out the worst of us. You can expect an angry (or a drunk) man to act as a stupid and vile person.
What's disgusting is E1's lucidity, while doing all of this.
Don't try to blame the victim.
A "racist" victim.
Yes, a racist victim.
Again, rage brings out the worst of us; an angry person is often willing to go to whatever extent in order to harm his opponent.
That, however, does not justify E1's behaviour. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
436
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 21:26:00 -
[20] - Quote
Myriad Blaze wrote:David Kir wrote:Being podded to newbie SP condition is an accepted gameplay mechanic. All of us accept it whenever we undock.
Being provoked and humiliated, recorded and made fun of in public is not. I just provided that as an example why CCP can't claim they didn't know about the bonus room. Nothing more.
Np, I just wanted to point that out, since lots of people around here are equating this episode to suicide ganking, scamming, ratter hunting and whatnot. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
436
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 21:33:00 -
[21] - Quote
Navi Annages wrote:David Kir wrote:Navi Annages wrote:David Kir wrote:
There's quite the difference between the actions and words of an angry man, and the purposeful provocation and humiliation inflicted by E1.
Anger brings out the worst of us. You can expect an angry (or a drunk) man to act as a stupid and vile person.
What's disgusting is E1's lucidity, while doing all of this.
Don't try to blame the victim.
A "racist" victim. Yes, a racist victim. Again, rage brings out the worst of us; an angry person is often willing to go to whatever extent in order to harm his opponent. That, however, does not justify E1's behaviour. Hey man anyones behavior on the outside world is there own choosing. Who is anyone to judge? The constitution allows it. Go read whatever religious text consoles you on the matter.
I am free to judge whoever I want. I am not free to inflict my convinctions upon E1, but I am free to condemn his behaviour as disgusting, according to my own moral parameters.
I am not one of those who want him banned. I am one of those who are disgusted.
Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
441
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 21:39:00 -
[22] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
Anger is an excuse for death threats and racism. Man, those *** guys must be continually pissed.
While I hate to use a real life example, I'll do it here. It's like self defense. You can defend your self against someone else trying to hurt you, but there is a limit to that. A guy slaps you in the face makes you angry and justifies self defense, but thats no reason to kill the guy, chop him up , kidnap his family and force feed his remains to them (srry, was watcing Southpark).
More than once I've seen someone go too far in self defense (like for example chasing down a guy who snatched an iphone, getting the iphone back the procedding to stomp the theif to the point where he ends up with brain damage and multiple broken bones) and the result has been the appropriate one: the original attacker is usually convicted where as the person who went too far gets even more time.
That's what should happen here. If somehting happens to Erotica1 (and well, who knows, it might be justified), the racist guy throwing real life death threats should get even more.
Yes. But your real life analogy is not accurate.
E1 was not harmed here. You can say whatever you want, but no harm came of this to Erotica 1.
The one and only harmed person, here, is the gullible man called Sokhar. He was provoked and humiliated, recorded and made fun of. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
443
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 21:50:00 -
[23] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
No one said anything about Erotica1 being hurt, HOWEVER Erotica1 was subjected to death threats, which is WAY worse than losing some video game assets because you were greedy.
That is the point. Sohkar or whatever his name was had a right to be mad. He had no right to break the law and spew racist abuse at anyone. He went too far.
To proper thing to have done was tell erotica1 to go screw himself (which isn't a threat but rather a fun at home activity) and disconnect. That he did not makes his actions more reprehensible than anything Erotica1 did or could have done.
The death threats (of an angry man) were the reactions.
The response does not justify Erotica 1's behaviour.
There's a chronological order to respect, when debating faults.
The "proper reaction" is irrelevant, as this person was brought to what I would never call a "proper" state of mind.
Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
443
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 21:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
Capt Starfox wrote:David Kir wrote:
Yes. But your real life analogy is not accurate.
E1 was not harmed here. You can say whatever you want, but no harm came of this to Erotica 1.
The one and only harmed person, here, is the gullible man called Sokhar. He was provoked and humiliated, recorded and made fun of.
You do realize that the only person involved in this event that could face criminal charges is Sokhar, right?
I don't care about criminal charges. I care about a type of behaviour that I would only call disgusting.
They are both at fault, but Erotica 1's actions are what caused his reaction.
Furthermore, E1 was not harmed by all of this. Sokhar was. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
446
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 21:57:00 -
[25] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:David Kir wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
No one said anything about Erotica1 being hurt, HOWEVER Erotica1 was subjected to death threats, which is WAY worse than losing some video game assets because you were greedy.
That is the point. Sohkar or whatever his name was had a right to be mad. He had no right to break the law and spew racist abuse at anyone. He went too far.
To proper thing to have done was tell erotica1 to go screw himself (which isn't a threat but rather a fun at home activity) and disconnect. That he did not makes his actions more reprehensible than anything Erotica1 did or could have done.
The death threats (of an angry man) were the reactions. The response does not justify Erotica 1's behaviour. There's a chronological order to respect, when debating faults. The "proper reaction" is irrelevant, as this person was brought to what I would never call a "proper" state of mind. You seem to have an issue with readong comprehension. Who said anyhting about justifying Erotica1's actions? Again, there is NO justifcation, whatsoever for death threats and racial abuse. Erotica1 could have threatened his life and made racial slurs 1st and thats STILL not a justification for What that sohkar guy did. Which is why I say, if anything happens to erotica1 , it is only right that worse sanctions be applied to the person who actually broke the law and rules of the game (racial abuse is prohibited in EVE online)
But the racial abuse did not happen within EULA domain. Neither did Erotica 1's actions.
You have an issue with reading comprehension: I have already stated that I do not care about what happens to the two of them: I am only arguying the resons of my positions on this matter.
I find Erotica 1's behaviour disgusting, and that's what I'm arguing.
Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
446
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 22:00:00 -
[26] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: I don't see any harm done to Sokhar at all, except to perhaps his pride.
I'd politely ask you to read this post out loud, and perhaps sing a song for me, but apparently that would allow you to justifiably react somewhat violently as it would alter your frame of mind.
I do. I can see how a person can feel abused, after being subjected to provocations and humiliation for over two hours.
And I don't care about what you see. You are entitled to your own opinion. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
446
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 22:02:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
If you are arguing nothing, why ar eyou wasting your time with posting?
What im tellling you is that you posistion is simply incorrect.
You and everyone else are free to find the actions disgusting if you like. But the fact that you find those action disgusting but then make excuses for RACISM and DEATH THREATS says worse things about you than Erotica1s' creepy actions say about him.
Because I want to.
Also, as another forum user kindly suggested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximate_cause Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
446
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 22:04:00 -
[28] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:David Kir wrote:Ranger 1 wrote: I don't see any harm done to Sokhar at all, except to perhaps his pride.
I'd politely ask you to read this post out loud, and perhaps sing a song for me, but apparently that would allow you to justifiably react somewhat violently as it would alter your frame of mind.
I do. I can see how a person can feel abused, after being subjected to provocations and humiliation for over two hours. And I don't care about what you see. You are entitled to your own opinion. You forgot the word voluntarily. 
You forgot that he never agreed to being provoked and humiliated. He agreed to singing (et caetera).
There's a difference between agreeing to dig a well and then being told to dig ten. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
449
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 22:09:00 -
[29] - Quote
Danalee wrote:David Kir wrote:
You forgot that he never agreed to being provoked and humiliated. He agreed to singing (et caetera).
There's a difference between agreeing to dig a well and then being told to dig ten.
So he agreed to singing and how did he get humiliated again? D. 
I should know better than arguing with people like you; I can't show you that which you refuse to see. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
453
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 22:31:00 -
[30] - Quote
Well, that's it for me, it's late in the evening and there's work to be done tomorrow. There's very little that I can discuss with the people defending Eroica 1, since they refuse to see how Sokhar was humiliated.
I find Erotica 1's actions to be disgusting, according to my own moral compass. I would never associate with such a man, and I'm frightened by the perspectiv of meeting someon like him "IRL".
I find Sokhar's reaction to be extreme (and reprehensible), but less so than E1's actions, given that: 1) It was the result of two hours of provocation and humiliation 2) It was the specific goal that Erotica 1 aimed to reach
I find that this kind of episodes are detrimental to EVE's health and reputations, and that they are not comparable to episodes such as the GHSC heist, given that they do not rely on gameplay mechanics.
I've made my points; each of you is fully entitled to his own opinion. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
454
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 22:38:00 -
[31] - Quote
DJentropy Ovaert wrote:
Giving the section in question a second listen, it seemed to me like E1 was quite suprised when the death threats and nbombs started dropping. In fact, our "victim" surprised me with this - and lost any sympathy he could have gotten from me in the first place.
Urgh. The last post, I swear to myself.
He didn't expect that degree of aggressivity; that disgusted me, too. Again, rage brings out the worst of us, and that's what we see, in this case.
But his ultimate goal was to provoke an emotional reaction ("harvest tears"?) , and that's what he obtained. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
459
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 23:14:00 -
[32] - Quote
not yet
EDIT: HA! Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
459
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 23:25:00 -
[33] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:David Kir wrote:not yet
EDIT: HA! Fail.
Do you want to go to jelly school? Because, I'm calling it. I'm calling the jelly school, 'mkay? Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
459
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:49:00 -
[34] - Quote
embrel wrote:Sentamon wrote:
Carebears have always been the slimiest of the mmo participants, destroying all fun in any mmo they chose to take part in.
HTFU?
Damn carebears, ruining all the fun!
This single post is worth the thread. Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |

David Kir
Jellyneers ACE Li3 Federation
461
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:20:00 -
[35] - Quote
olan2005 wrote:
I think you hit the nail on the head with that . Where is the line in these situations. For all discussions and commentators most agree, myself including scamming is fine. But once scam is completed and you have all possible assets extracted , is it ok to prolong the ordeal for the sucker ( victime , self inflicted) for tear extraction as it is called in-game. Should the EULA be more stringent on that aspect of scamming. Me personally i say yes . As for punshment i will disagree , there should be perma ban for Erotica1 for taking it too far, then putting this public domain which has a consequence for the whole community. There should be a temp ban for the sucker (victim ,self inflicted ) for the racism , and threats that followed. Why the lesser punishment . He was under self inflicted emotional duress, which was not completely under his control as his assets where being held to ransom , by that he had to play or loose everything he built up in his eve carrier . Coercion is used by Erotica1 , the scenario was set up by erotica1 , The control to end this was completely in Erotica1 hands . Ultimate responsibility is with the scammer Erotica1 for this entire situation
You have all of my respect; this is one of the few rational responses I have seen on this thread.
Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die. |
|
|